AI challenge

We want to leave an AI platform or vendor but are technically stuck

A platform that gave you speed at the start can later hold you back. Maybe the costs are too high, functionality is missing or you want more control. We find out how deep the dependency really goes and how to get out in a controlled way.

Does this sound familiar?

Lock-in often only becomes visible the moment you actually want to change something.

  1. Exporting data turns out to be hard

    Important information sits in proprietary storage or formats.

  2. Workflows use platform-specific features

    The functionality isn't easily available one-to-one elsewhere.

  3. Costs or terms are changing

    The platform is no longer as attractive as when you started.

  4. Nobody knows how big a migration will be

    Your own code and vendor functionality have become intertwined over time.

Where do you want to be?

You want the vendor to become a technical choice again, instead of a condition for your product's survival.

Insight into real dependencies

You know which data, functionality and workflows are tied specifically to the vendor.

A realistic migration route

Not everything has to be replaced in one risky big bang.

More technical freedom of choice

The new architecture makes future changes easier.

Why does this happen?

Vendor lock-in rarely sits in a single API call. Dependencies can be spread across data, code, infrastructure and operational processes.

See how we approach this

Convenience hides technical choices

Managed platforms combine several functions, so the boundaries only become visible when you want to leave.

Proprietary functionality grows along

The longer the platform is used, the more specific features become part of the product.

Migration risk becomes too big

Eventually nobody dares to change anything because it's unclear what will be affected.

Why 9to5 for this?

We're not tied to one model provider or AI platform. The technology should serve the product, not the other way around.

View cases

Independent technical advice

We assess keeping, migrating and replacing as real alternatives.

Integrations are core work

We can build adapters and migration layers where a phased switch is smarter.

Deliberately reduce lock-in

The new situation should offer more freedom of choice than the old one.

What else fits your situation?