AI challenge

Our own development team is technically stuck

Sometimes you don't need an extra team. You need someone who quickly gets to the bottom of one complicated technical problem, solves it together with your engineers and then leaves again. That is where we like to step in.

Does this sound familiar?

A good software team doesn't automatically have all the experience with agents, LLMs, agentic coding (Claude Code, Codex) and production AI in-house.

  1. The team keeps returning to the same problem

    Different solutions are tried without a structural breakthrough.

  2. AI-specific choices remain uncertain

    Model behaviour, evals, agent architecture or retrieval call for different experience.

  3. An integration turns out much harder than expected

    The problem sits on the boundary between existing software and the new AI functionality.

  4. A senior hire is disproportionate

    You need specific expertise now, but not necessarily permanently.

Where do you want to be?

You don't want to replace the existing team, but to remove the technical blocker so the team can move forward on its own again.

The hard part gets solved

Senior engineers tackle exactly the part the team is stuck on.

Knowledge stays in-house

Your engineers understand the solution and the most important trade-offs.

No extra dependency

After the rescue, 9to5 doesn't need to remain part of the team permanently.

Why does this happen?

AI projects combine several disciplines. Even a strong development team doesn't need to have immediate experience with every specialist part.

See how we approach this

The problem is multidisciplinary

Software architecture, models, data, integrations and observability all touch.

Experience with this specific failure mode is missing

Some problems are solved much faster when you've seen them before.

Internal experimenting gets expensive

After several failed routes, searching further costs more than temporary specialist help.

Why 9to5 for this?

This is how we want to work: bring in senior engineering where it gets hard and leave again once your own team can carry on.

View cases

Engineers work with engineers

No advisory layer between the problem and the people who actually change the code.

The existing stack remains the starting point

We don't bring in a new tool or architecture by default.

Handover from the start

The solution doesn't become needlessly dependent on whoever built it.

What else fits your situation?