AI challenge

How do we add AI to our existing product?

You don't have to make your product "AI-first" to use AI well. Often most of the value lies in one targeted improvement of an existing workflow. So the first question is not how to add AI, but where.

Does this sound familiar?

This often comes up when competitors launch AI features or users start asking what AI could mean in the product.

  1. There are several possible AI features

    Summarising, generating, searching, agents and automation all seem interesting.

  2. You don't want to build a gimmick

    The feature has to demonstrably solve an existing user problem better.

  3. The feature needs product data

    AI has to be able to safely use information that is already in the software.

  4. The existing architecture sets limits

    You want to avoid one AI feature becoming a separate technical island.

Where do you want to be?

You want to know which AI feature delivers enough user value and technically fits the product that already exists.

A sharp product use case

You know which user can solve which problem better with AI.

A fitting technical architecture

The new functionality connects to existing data, auth and business logic.

A realistic implementation route

You know what needs testing first and what can then be built production-ready.

Why does this happen?

Adding AI to existing software is both a product choice and an architecture choice.

See how we approach this

The technology draws too much attention

An interesting AI possibility is not yet a useful product feature.

Existing data and permissions count

A feature has to fit the same user and security context as the rest of the product.

New failure modes are added

Variable quality, latency and model costs have to become part of the product experience.

Why 9to5 for this?

9to5 software likes working in existing products and codebases. So AI doesn't have to stay a separate experiment next to the real product.

View cases

Product and technology together

We assess both user value and technical consequences.

Existing software remains the starting point

Auth, data and business logic are reused where possible.

From exploration to real implementation

If the use case holds up, the same engineers can also build the hard technical follow-up.

What else fits your situation?