AI challenge

Our AI prototype has to go to production

A demo may act strangely now and then, production software may not. As soon as an AI prototype touches real users, data and business processes, the requirements change. We help determine what still lies between a successful experiment and a reliable production solution.

Does this sound familiar?

The prototype does what it should, but you notice there is still a big gap between demonstrating and going live responsibly.

  1. The happy flow works

    Demos go well, but edge cases and errors have hardly been worked out.

  2. You don't know what good enough is

    There are no clear quality thresholds, evals or acceptance criteria yet.

  3. Production questions pile up

    Security, monitoring, costs, retries, permissions and support suddenly become important.

  4. The first real users are coming

    You want to prevent them from discovering the technical weak spots for you.

Where do you want to be?

You want to keep what the prototype has proven, but reduce the technical risks before the system is used seriously.

Reliable under real conditions

The solution can deal with errors, unexpected input and external systems that don't always cooperate.

Measurable behaviour

You can track whether quality, latency, costs and error rates stay within acceptable limits.

Manageable in production

Deployment, logging, security and human oversight are part of the system instead of separate aftercare.

Why does this happen?

A prototype is built to prove an assumption. Production software has to deal with uncertainty, errors and real users for a long time.

See how we approach this

Reliability was not yet a main goal

During an experiment, speed of learning is usually more important than complete error handling.

AI does not behave deterministically

Good behaviour has to be measured and bounded instead of only being judged during a demo.

The rest of the software now counts

Data, permissions, integrations, deployment and monitoring become just as important as the AI functionality itself.

Why 9to5 for this?

For us, taking AI to production is mainly software engineering around a non-deterministic component. That calls for regular production-grade principles and AI-specific evaluation.

View cases

Beyond the demo

We look at errors, edge cases, integrations and operational behaviour.

Human-in-the-loop where needed

Not every risk is solved with more AI.

Built for handover

Architecture and choices are recorded so that your own team can continue afterwards.

What else fits your situation?