[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":565},["ShallowReactive",2],{"footer-vacatures-en":3,"use-case-ai-project-overnemen-van-andere-leverancier-en":4,"content-by-keys-offers-en-vibe-code-rescue-audit,rescue-sprint":94,"content-by-keys-useCases-en-technische-second-opinion-ai,prototype-naar-onderhoudbaar-softwareproduct":357,"content-by-keys-cases-en-":512,"content-by-keys-buyerTriggers-en-vastgelopen-met-ai":513},[],{"id":5,"title":6,"body":7,"description":11,"desiredOutcome":14,"extension":26,"hero":27,"key":29,"meta":30,"navigation":31,"path":32,"problem":33,"proof":45,"recognition":57,"recommendedApproach":72,"relations":74,"seo":84,"stem":87,"summary":88,"visuals":89,"__hash__":93},"useCases_en\u002Fuse-cases\u002Fai-project-overnemen-van-andere-leverancier.md","Another vendor left something behind that we can't properly continue with",{"type":8,"value":9,"toc":10},"minimark",[],{"title":11,"searchDepth":12,"depth":12,"links":13},"",2,[],{"intro":15,"items":16},"The system should be understandable to more people than just the party that built it.\n",[17,20,23],{"title":18,"text":19},"Technical grip regained","Architecture, deployment, data and external dependencies are clear again.\n",{"title":21,"text":22},"Risks are prioritised","You know which parts are fine and where work is needed first.\n",{"title":24,"text":25},"The project becomes transferable again","Your team or a new vendor can continue development responsibly.\n","md",{"intro":28},"The original developer is gone, the documentation is thin and every change starts with the question: does anyone know how this works? We can step in, reconstruct what is there and get you moving again.\n","ai-project-overnemen-van-andere-leverancier",{},true,"\u002Fuse-cases\u002Fai-project-overnemen-van-andere-leverancier",{"intro":34,"causes":35},"Taking over software is more than getting access to the Git repository.\n",[36,39,42],{"title":37,"text":38},"Knowledge sat with people, not in the system","Architecture and operational choices were never documented well enough.\n",{"title":40,"text":41},"Ownership is scattered","Code, infrastructure, accounts and data may sit with different parties.\n",{"title":43,"text":44},"The technical quality is still unknown","You don't know what merely feels unfamiliar and what is an actual risk.\n",{"intro":46,"points":47},"Stepping into existing software is part of senior engineering. You don't need to have built the system yourself to bring structure and grip back into it.\n",[48,51,54],{"title":49,"text":50},"We start with what exists","A different vendor is no reason to rebuild right away.\n",{"title":52,"text":53},"Code and operations","Deployment, accounts and integrations belong to the handover just as much.\n",{"title":55,"text":56},"Avoiding a new dependency","The software should be easier to hand over after our work, not harder.\n",{"intro":58,"signals":59},"A handover can be complete on paper while the most important knowledge is still missing.\n",[60,63,66,69],{"title":61,"text":62},"The repository is there, but context is missing","Important choices were never recorded anywhere.\n",{"title":64,"text":65},"Deployment is a black box","Nobody knows exactly which steps, accounts or infrastructure are needed.\n",{"title":67,"text":68},"External services are scattered","Credentials, providers and admin accounts sit with different people or parties.\n",{"title":70,"text":71},"Every change first requires research","Engineers have to reconstruct again and again how functionality fits together.\n",{"intro":73},"With a Vibe Code Rescue Audit we first reconstruct what is there and what is still missing. Specific technical blockers can then be tackled in a Rescue Sprint.\n",{"buyerTriggerKeys":75,"primaryOfferKey":77,"offerKeys":78,"caseKeys":80,"relatedUseCaseKeys":81},[76],"vastgelopen-met-ai","vibe-code-rescue-audit",[77,79],"rescue-sprint",[],[82,83],"technische-second-opinion-ai","prototype-naar-onderhoudbaar-softwareproduct",{"title":85,"description":86},"Take over an AI project from another vendor | 9to5 software","Stuck with software from a previous vendor? 9to5 reconstructs architecture and code, maps the risks and makes the project transferable again.\n","use-cases\u002Fai-project-overnemen-van-andere-leverancier","The software exists, but knowledge, documentation or technical grip is missing after another party left.\n",{"hero":90,"problem":91,"proof":92},"sq-tangle-knot","sq-connect-nodes","ls-rescue-repair","rxzyg-E8-PHje_fvva9yRDf64IMLaDvF_b0hlCG-M4Y",[95,237],{"id":96,"title":97,"body":98,"catalogue":102,"cta":103,"description":11,"extension":26,"fit":108,"hero":116,"key":77,"meta":119,"navigation":31,"next":120,"outcome":133,"path":145,"price":146,"process":149,"proof":164,"relations":178,"scope":190,"seo":223,"stem":226,"summary":227,"summaryPanel":228,"visuals":233,"__hash__":236},"offers_en\u002Foffers\u002Fvibe-code-rescue-audit.md","Vibe Code Rescue Audit",{"type":8,"value":99,"toc":100},[],{"title":11,"searchDepth":12,"depth":12,"links":101},[],null,{"title":104,"body":105,"primaryCta":106,"local":107},"No idea what to fix anymore?","Let us first figure out what you actually have. Then you can make a technical decision without blindly prompting on or throwing everything away.\n","Book a Rescue Audit","Vibe Code Rescue by senior engineers from Delft, for teams in Delft, The Hague, Rotterdam and the surrounding area.\n",{"title":109,"intro":110,"useCaseKeys":111},"When is this offer a fit?","When you sense something is technically wrong, but the actual cause or extent isn't clear yet.\n",[112,113,114,115],"vibe-coded-app-professionaliseren","ai-agent-niet-betrouwbaar","gegenereerde-code-niet-meer-begrijpelijk","vibe-code-project-vastgelopen",{"headline":117,"intro":118,"primaryCta":106},"Find out what is really wrong before you rebuild everything.","You already have software, but no longer know which problems are superficial and which are structural. We reconstruct how the system works, separate technical debt from real risks and give you a prioritised route forward.\n",{},{"title":121,"items":122},"What happens next?",[123,126,130],{"title":124,"text":125,"offerKey":79},"A clear rescue goal?","Then we can tackle it in a focused Rescue Sprint.\n",{"title":127,"text":128,"offerKey":129},"Turns out to be a bigger build project?","Then we scope Build & Integrate as a fixed engagement.\n","build-integrate",{"title":131,"text":132},"Turns out little is wrong?","Then we'll simply tell you. A follow-up is not required.\n",{"title":134,"items":135},"Afterwards you have...",[136,139,142],{"title":137,"text":138},"Technical grip on what is there","Architecture, key dependencies and critical risks are clear again.\n",{"title":140,"text":141},"A prioritised rescue plan","You know what can stay, what really needs to change and in which order.\n",{"title":143,"text":144},"A decision on the follow-up approach","Fixing, partially rebuilding, developing further at a larger scale or doing nothing becomes a conscious choice.\n","\u002Foffers\u002Fvibe-code-rescue-audit",{"label":147,"type":148},"€2,950 excl. VAT","fixed",{"title":150,"steps":151},"How it works.",[152,155,158,161],{"title":153,"text":154},"Confirm the rescue goal","We determine which questions the Audit needs to answer and where the biggest uncertainty lies.\n",{"title":156,"text":157},"Reconstruct code + system","We read the architecture, code, deployment, data flows and relevant dependencies.\n",{"title":159,"text":160},"Prioritise problems","We distinguish cosmetic debt, development blockers and real production or security risks.\n",{"title":162,"text":163},"Rescue plan + debrief","You get a concrete route with what can stay, what needs to change and what makes sense next.\n",{"title":165,"intro":166,"points":167,"caseKeys":177},"Why should you believe this?","Assessing an existing codebase takes more than an automated quality score. It takes senior engineers who can see which problems actually hurt.\n",[168,171,174],{"title":169,"text":170},"Existing software is where we work","A messy or AI-generated codebase is no reason to automatically start over.\n",{"title":172,"text":173},"Software engineering and AI","We look at both regular production-grade problems and AI-specific failure modes.\n",{"title":175,"text":176},"Follow-up work is not a requirement","If the best conclusion is that your current route is fine, the engagement can end there.\n",[],{"buyerTriggerKeys":179,"useCaseKeys":180,"relatedOfferKeys":188,"caseKeys":189},[76],[112,181,113,114,182,183,184,185,82,29,186,83,187,115],"ai-prototype-naar-productie","ai-code-breekt-steeds","security-en-privacy-ai-oplossing","ai-oplossing-te-langzaam","ai-oplossing-te-duur","ai-experiment-heeft-echte-gebruikers","weg-bij-ai-platform-of-leverancier",[79,129],[],{"title":191,"intro":192,"activities":193,"deliverables":205,"exclusions":216},"What is included in this offer?","A technical diagnosis of one existing application or codebase, aimed at decision-making.\n",{"intro":194,"items":195},"We look broadly enough to find structural causes, without turning it into a theoretical code review.\n",[196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204],"Examining architecture and code quality","Assessing dependencies and technical debt","Reviewing authentication and authorisation","Examining the data layer and relevant integrations","Assessing deployment and error handling","Reviewing tests, logging and monitoring","Listing security risks at a high level","Examining AI-specific failure modes","Assessing maintainability and lock-in",{"intro":206,"items":207},"You get a technical verdict you can actually base a follow-up on.\n",[208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215],"Architecture overview","Prioritised list of problems and risks","What can stay","What needs to be adjusted","What may need to be redone","Advice: fix \u002F partially rebuild \u002F rebuild","Proposed order and size of the follow-up","Technical debrief with a senior engineer",{"intro":217,"items":218},"The Audit delivers understanding and a plan. Major fixes don't quietly become part of the analysis.\n",[219,220,221,222],"Full repair of the codebase","Complete rewrite","Unbounded pentest or formal security audit","Product development beyond small diagnostic changes",{"title":224,"description":225},"Vibe Code Rescue Audit | Stuck with AI code | 9to5 software","Vibe-coded app (Lovable, Cursor, Bolt, Replit) or AI project stuck? 9to5 examines architecture, code, security, tests and deployment and gives you a rescue plan.\n","offers\u002Fvibe-code-rescue-audit","We examine what you have, what can stay as it is, where the real risks are and how you can move forward responsibly again.\n",{"qualifier":229,"result":230,"duration":231,"nextStep":232},"Fixed price · one existing application or codebase","Technical grip on what exists and a prioritised rescue plan","About two weeks","A Rescue Sprint for the most important problem, or continue yourself",{"hero":90,"proof":234,"process":235},"sq-orient-options","ls-route-converge","IWSlwlvSU82rOHwWTXtSCvLbfXjNUybu2L5bZ-96IJY",{"id":238,"title":239,"body":240,"catalogue":102,"cta":244,"description":11,"extension":26,"fit":249,"hero":256,"key":79,"meta":259,"navigation":31,"next":260,"outcome":271,"path":282,"price":283,"process":286,"proof":299,"relations":312,"scope":317,"seo":344,"stem":347,"summary":348,"summaryPanel":349,"visuals":354,"__hash__":356},"offers_en\u002Foffers\u002Frescue-sprint.md","Rescue Sprint",{"type":8,"value":241,"toc":242},[],{"title":11,"searchDepth":12,"depth":12,"links":243},[],{"title":245,"body":246,"primaryCta":247,"local":248},"Do you know what's broken?","Share the technical problem with us. If it's sharp enough, we don't need to sell you an extra audit first.\n","Plan a Rescue Sprint","Temporary senior engineering from Delft, available for technical AI and software problems in the region.\n",{"title":109,"intro":250,"useCaseKeys":251},"When the technical problem is sharp enough to fix right away.\n",[252,253,254,255],"vast-op-auth-database-of-rechten","ai-koppelen-aan-bestaande-systemen","tests-evals-monitoring-voor-ai","developmentteam-loopt-vast-met-ai",{"headline":257,"intro":258,"primaryCta":247},"One clear technical problem. One week of senior engineering.","You know where the problem is, but your team can't solve it or lacks exactly the specialist experience needed right now. We step in with focus, fix the hard part and make sure you can move forward again afterwards.\n",{},{"title":121,"items":261},[262,265,268],{"title":263,"text":264},"Done? Then we leave.","If you can continue independently, the Sprint has succeeded.\n",{"title":266,"text":267,"offerKey":79},"Another clear rescue goal?","Then you can use a next Sprint as a new fixed scope.\n",{"title":269,"text":270,"offerKey":129},"Turns out bigger than a Sprint?","Then we scope Build & Integrate. If the cause is unclear after all, the Rescue Audit comes first.\n",{"title":134,"items":272},[273,276,279],{"title":274,"text":275},"The concrete problem is tackled","The agreed technical blocker is solved or demonstrably moved forward.\n",{"title":277,"text":278},"The change is set up professionally","Where needed we add tests, evals, guardrails or production preconditions.\n",{"title":280,"text":281},"Your team can move forward again","Code, choices and follow-up are documented and technically handed over.\n","\u002Foffers\u002Frescue-sprint",{"label":284,"suffix":285,"type":148},"€5,950 excl. VAT","per Sprint",{"title":150,"steps":287},[288,290,293,296],{"title":153,"text":289},"We check whether the problem is sharp enough for a Sprint.\n",{"title":291,"text":292},"Understand context + code","We read exactly enough to intervene responsibly.\n",{"title":294,"text":295},"Solve + test","We implement the fix and add the quality layer it needs.\n",{"title":297,"text":298},"Document + hand over","We record choices and make sure your team can continue independently again.\n",{"title":165,"intro":300,"points":301,"caseKeys":311},"This is exactly the kind of work senior engineers are valuable for: quickly understanding an unfamiliar codebase, solving the hard part and leaving again.\n",[302,305,308],{"title":303,"text":304},"Senior AI + software engineers","We step in where it gets complicated and leave when it's done.\n",{"title":306,"text":307},"We work in what is already there","We don't expect you to migrate everything to our favourite stack first.\n",{"title":309,"text":310},"Yours as soon as it's done","We document, hand over and leave as soon as you can continue on your own.\n",[],{"buyerTriggerKeys":313,"useCaseKeys":314,"relatedOfferKeys":315,"caseKeys":316},[76],[252,253,254,255],[77,129],[],{"title":191,"intro":318,"activities":319,"deliverables":328,"exclusions":337},"One Sprint has one clear rescue goal. That boundary keeps it fast and honest.\n",{"intro":320,"items":321},"We do what is technically needed to tackle the agreed problem responsibly.\n",[322,323,324,325,326,327],"Understanding the relevant code and context","Reproducing and confirming the root cause","Implementing a targeted fix or technical improvement","Adding relevant tests, evals or checks","Adjusting integration, deployment or data where the goal requires it","Recording and handing over technical choices",{"intro":329,"items":330},"Working engineering in the existing codebase, not an advice document someone else still has to carry out.\n",[331,332,333,334,335,336],"Implemented technical change","Relevant tests or quality checks","Working code in the agreed environment","Documentation of key choices","Handover to your own team","Clarity about any remaining follow-up",{"intro":338,"items":339},"A Sprint is bounded and doesn't quietly turn into an open-ended project.\n",[340,341,342,343],"Multiple separate rescue goals at once","Unbounded refactor of the whole codebase","Major new product features beyond the rescue goal","Automatic extension or retainer",{"title":345,"description":346},"Rescue Sprint | Senior AI & software engineering | 9to5 software","One week of senior engineering for a technical blocker in AI, an AI agent or vibe-coded software. Repair, test, document and hand over, €5,950 excl. VAT.\n","offers\u002Frescue-sprint","One week of senior engineering focused on one clear technical rescue goal. No retainer and no endless engagement.\n",{"qualifier":350,"result":351,"duration":352,"nextStep":353},"Per Sprint · one clear rescue goal","The agreed technical blocker solved, tested and handed over","One week","You take it over, or another Sprint for a new goal",{"hero":90,"proof":355,"process":92},"sq-guardrails-check","RBo-3uCvL4DWueBHoZFGrqKFPfwCZ1QLbywOlnLG0NY",[358,434],{"id":359,"title":360,"body":361,"description":11,"desiredOutcome":365,"extension":26,"hero":377,"key":82,"meta":379,"navigation":31,"path":380,"problem":381,"proof":393,"recognition":405,"recommendedApproach":420,"relations":422,"seo":427,"stem":430,"summary":431,"visuals":432,"__hash__":433},"useCases_en\u002Fuse-cases\u002Ftechnische-second-opinion-ai.md","We want an independent technical second opinion",{"type":8,"value":362,"toc":363},[],{"title":11,"searchDepth":12,"depth":12,"links":364},[],{"intro":366,"items":367},"You don't want an extra opinion that makes the discussion bigger. You want enough technical clarity to make a better decision yourself.\n",[368,371,374],{"title":369,"text":370},"Separate facts from assumptions","You see which technical conclusions are solid and where uncertainty remains.\n",{"title":372,"text":373},"Alternatives become visible","You know whether the proposed route really is the only logical option.\n",{"title":375,"text":376},"A concrete next decision","After the review you know what to investigate, keep, adjust or drop.\n",{"intro":378},"Maybe your vendor says everything has to be rebuilt. Maybe your own team thinks it's fine. When a lot of money or risk depends on the next step, an independent technical view can be well worth having.\n",{},"\u002Fuse-cases\u002Ftechnische-second-opinion-ai",{"intro":382,"causes":383},"Technical choices are not fully objective. Everyone looks at the same situation from their own experience, interests and preferences.\n",[384,387,390],{"title":385,"text":386},"Vendors mainly know their own tools","A proposal can unconsciously steer towards solutions that suit the vendor.\n",{"title":388,"text":389},"Existing teams get used to limitations","What feels normal internally can be obvious technical debt to an outsider.\n",{"title":391,"text":392},"Big decisions become final too early","Sometimes evidence is still missing for assumptions on which a far-reaching choice is based.\n",{"intro":394,"points":395},"A good second opinion doesn't automatically sell a larger follow-up engagement. The outcome may simply be that the existing route is fine.\n",[396,399,402],{"title":397,"text":398},"Engineers first","The assessment is made from the perspective of technical feasibility and risk.\n",{"title":400,"text":401},"Build, buy or change nothing","We have no stake in one specific technical outcome.\n",{"title":403,"text":404},"Follow-up is not required","If the conclusion is clear, the engagement can simply end there.\n",{"intro":406,"signals":407},"A second opinion is especially useful when the next technical step is large, expensive or hard to reverse.\n",[408,411,414,417],{"title":409,"text":410},"A vendor wants to rebuild a lot","You want to know whether that's technically necessary or mainly the easiest route for them.\n",{"title":412,"text":413},"Internal opinions differ","Different engineers judge the same risks differently.\n",{"title":415,"text":416},"The architecture feels more complicated than needed","Many new tools, platforms or layers are being proposed.\n",{"title":418,"text":419},"You're facing a big investment","Before continuing, you want to know whether the technical foundation makes sense.\n",{"intro":421},"The Vibe Code Rescue Audit fits here as an independent technical review. We look at what's actually there, test the most important assumptions and give a concrete technical debrief. Follow-up work is only needed if there is a substantive reason for it.\n",{"buyerTriggerKeys":423,"primaryOfferKey":77,"offerKeys":424,"caseKeys":425,"relatedUseCaseKeys":426},[76],[77,79],[],[29,187],{"title":428,"description":429},"Technical second opinion for an AI project | 9to5 software","Need an independent technical second opinion on an AI solution, architecture or vendor? Senior engineers from 9to5 assess what's there.\n","use-cases\u002Ftechnische-second-opinion-ai","There's already an architecture, solution or proposal, but you want to know whether the technical choices make sense before investing further.\n",{"hero":234,"problem":355,"proof":235},"Mz9vCsA-Sb-E2hgZP7IGG0NRPbBoSbELaFOOyNALsPo",{"id":435,"title":436,"body":437,"description":11,"desiredOutcome":441,"extension":26,"hero":453,"key":83,"meta":455,"navigation":31,"path":456,"problem":457,"proof":469,"recognition":481,"recommendedApproach":496,"relations":498,"seo":503,"stem":506,"summary":507,"visuals":508,"__hash__":511},"useCases_en\u002Fuse-cases\u002Fprototype-naar-onderhoudbaar-softwareproduct.md","We want to go from prototype to a maintainable software product",{"type":8,"value":438,"toc":439},[],{"title":11,"searchDepth":12,"depth":12,"links":440},[],{"intro":442,"items":443},"Starting over isn't a given. What you want is a technical foundation on which a normal development team can keep building responsibly.\n",[444,447,450],{"title":445,"text":446},"Understandable architecture","It's clear where responsibilities and business logic belong.\n",{"title":448,"text":449},"A safe development cycle","Tests, deployment and error handling support frequent change.\n",{"title":451,"text":452},"Less knowledge in people's heads","Important technical choices and processes are sufficiently documented.\n",{"intro":454},"A prototype mainly has to answer one question quickly: does the idea work? A software product also has to stay understandable, survive changes and be maintainable by more than one person.\n",{},"\u002Fuse-cases\u002Fprototype-naar-onderhoudbaar-softwareproduct",{"intro":458,"causes":459},"Prototype code is optimised for speed of learning. Product software also has to be optimised for change.\n",[460,463,466],{"title":461,"text":462},"Architecture lagged behind product development","The prototype grew organically while requirements kept changing.\n",{"title":464,"text":465},"Temporary assumptions became structural","Choices that were logical for an experiment now determine how the whole product works.\n",{"title":467,"text":468},"Maintainability was not yet a success criterion","Tests, documentation and clear boundaries delivered little direct value during the first validation.\n",{"intro":470,"points":471},"9to5 software combines AI with regular senior software engineering. That is exactly what matters when a smart prototype has to become a durable product.\n",[472,475,478],{"title":473,"text":474},"Keep what works","A rewrite is one possible choice, not the default answer.\n",{"title":476,"text":477},"Maintainability is practical","We focus on changing, testing and releasing more safely.\n",{"title":479,"text":480},"Built for the next team","Software must stay understandable without its original builder too.\n",{"intro":482,"signals":483},"A lot of prototype code isn't bad at all. You just see more and more clearly where speed was chosen over maintainability.\n",[484,487,490,493],{"title":485,"text":486},"Temporary solutions have become permanent","Scripts, hardcoded values and shortcuts are now used by real flows.\n",{"title":488,"text":489},"New features take more and more effort","The existing structure no longer fits well with what the product has become.\n",{"title":491,"text":492},"Only one person understands critical parts","Knowledge transfer becomes hard and changes feel risky.\n",{"title":494,"text":495},"Releases are largely manual work","Deployment and configuration need steps that are easily forgotten or done wrong.\n",{"intro":497},"With a Vibe Code Rescue Audit we determine what forms a good foundation and what really holds development back. Build & Integrate can then carry out the larger professionalisation without automatically rebuilding the whole product.\n",{"buyerTriggerKeys":499,"primaryOfferKey":77,"offerKeys":500,"caseKeys":501,"relatedUseCaseKeys":502},[76],[77,129],[],[181,112],{"title":504,"description":505},"From prototype to maintainable software product | 9to5 software","Developing a prototype into maintainable software? 9to5 helps get architecture, code, tests, deployment and documentation ready for long-term use.\n","use-cases\u002Fprototype-naar-onderhoudbaar-softwareproduct","The core works, but the software has to be built so that a team can still change it safely in six or twelve months.\n",{"hero":509,"problem":90,"proof":510},"sq-foundation-build","ls-prototype-to-production","DfBDuBl23pxVzfnTmE43TF-OjYwrcBmYDpM95_zySzw",[],[514],{"id":515,"title":516,"approach":517,"body":531,"cta":535,"description":11,"extension":26,"hero":538,"key":76,"label":540,"meta":541,"navigation":31,"path":542,"proof":543,"relations":554,"seo":558,"stem":561,"summary":562,"visuals":563,"__hash__":564},"buyerTriggers_en\u002Fbuyer-triggers\u002Fvastgelopen-met-ai.md","We've already built something, but we're stuck.",{"title":518,"steps":519},"We step in, understand, repair and hand over.",[520,522,525,528],{"title":153,"text":521},"We establish what is actually going wrong, what is urgent and what needs to be demonstrably better after the rescue.\n",{"title":523,"text":524},"Understand the context and code","We examine the code, architecture, data flows, integrations and deployment until the source of the problem is clear.\n",{"title":526,"text":527},"Fix and test","We make targeted repairs, add tests, evals and guardrails where needed and check that the solution works under real conditions too.\n",{"title":529,"text":530},"Document and hand over","We document decisions, clear critical technical debt and make sure your team can move forward independently again.\n",{"type":8,"value":532,"toc":533},[],{"title":11,"searchDepth":12,"depth":12,"links":534},[],{"title":536,"body":537},"Stuck with AI or vibe-coded software?","Briefly describe what you have and where it is going wrong. We'll take a look and quickly tell you what makes sense to repair, keep or rebuild.\n",{"intro":539},"You don't have to start over just because things have become complicated. We step in, including when you have a vibe-coded app or code generated by AI tools such as Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. We understand what is there, find what is really going wrong and make it technically manageable again.\n","Stuck with AI",{},"\u002Fbuyer-triggers\u002Fvastgelopen-met-ai",{"intro":544,"points":545},"Assessing an existing codebase takes more than an automated quality score. It takes senior engineers who can identify the problems that really hurt and make targeted repairs.\n",[546,549,551],{"title":547,"text":548},"We work with existing software","A messy or AI-generated codebase is no reason to automatically start from scratch.\n",{"title":172,"text":550},"We look at everyday production problems and AI-specific failure modes, such as unreliable output and missing evals.\n",{"title":552,"text":553},"Move forward independently again","We document decisions and clear critical technical debt so your team can move forward on its own again.\n",{"useCaseKeys":555,"offerKeys":556,"caseKeys":557},[112,181,113,114,182,252,253,183,184,185,254,255,82,29,186,83,187,115],[77,79,129],[],{"title":559,"description":560},"Stuck with AI? Rescue by senior engineers | 9to5 software","Stuck with an AI agent, prototype or vibe-coded app (Lovable, Cursor, Bolt, Replit)? We analyse the problem, make targeted repairs and restore maintainability.\n","buyer-triggers\u002Fvastgelopen-met-ai","Something is already there, but it is unreliable, hard to understand or technically stuck. We need to get it back under control.\n",{"hero":90,"proof":92,"approach":92},"e0bDu3r1P4JqQOadOsQgPsL_EDOsQGpgsqBXrdwFTNw",1792049911607]